Comparative Evaluation of Surgical Site Infection after Laparoscopic Versus Open Appendectomy

Authors

  • Muhammad Khalid
  • Dr. Junaid Khan Lodhi
  • Asma Munaf
  • Javed Shakir
  • Imran Sadiq
  • Saba Tahir Bukhari

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51273/esc24.25132047

Abstract

Objective: to assess which of the two modalities (OA vs LA) is superior with regards to post-operative wound infection.
Material & Methods: This is a retrospective study that was conducted at surgical unit 1, Fatima Memorial
hospital Lahore from June 2021 to May 2023. 140 patients were segregated in two groups; group 1 had
laparoscopic appendectomy and group 2 who had open appendectomies. Primary post-operative outcome
with regards to wound infection was recorded on 7th postoperative day in each group.
Results: Surgical site infection was documented in 3 (4%) patients in group 1 and 9 (13%) patients in group 2.
Operation time was not found to be significant in both groups statistically (p= 0.342). WBC count was found
to be significant between both groups statistically (p= 0.003). length of stay in hospital was also significant
statistically (p=0.001).
Conclusion: Laparoscopic appendectomy seems superior to open appendectomy with regards to surgical site
infection. Operation time is not a determinant factor for development of SSI. Pre-operative WBS count is an
important predictive factor for development of SSI.
Keywords: Acute appendicitis, open and laparoscopic appendectomy, surgical site infection

Downloads

Published

2025-01-28

How to Cite

1.
Muhammad Khalid, Dr. Junaid Khan Lodhi, Asma Munaf, Javed Shakir, Imran Sadiq, Saba Tahir Bukhari. Comparative Evaluation of Surgical Site Infection after Laparoscopic Versus Open Appendectomy. Esculapio - JSIMS [Internet]. 2025 Jan. 28 [cited 2025 Jan. 30];20(4):483-5. Available from: https://esculapio.pk/journal/index.php/journal-files/article/view/1179

Issue

Section

Original Articles