OSAT (Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skill) as a Formative Assessment Tool in Gynecology
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51273/esc23.251319411Keywords:
OSAT (Objective Structured assessment of Technical Skills),, WPBA, Formative assessmentAbstract
Objective: To determine the impact of using Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skill (OSAT) as a formative assessment tool on the learning curve of postgraduate trainees performing surgery in live setting.
Material and Method: It is a quantitative, quasi-experimental study conducted at Gynecology department of Services Institute of Medical Sciences from January 10, 2023 to September 30, 2023. Trainees were assessed in five OSAT encounters by faculty using standardized structured scoring sheet using global rating scale on a 5-point Likert scale. The data was analyzed using S.P.S.S version 22.0.
Results: Mean scores of trainees significantly improved with each OSAT encounter.
Conclusion: In conclusion, OSAT using the global rating scale in live setting, is validated by the fact that the scores improved with successive OSAT encounters
References
. Norcini J, Burch V. Workplace-based assessment as an educational tool: AMEE Guide No. 31. Medical Teacher. 2007;29(9-10):855-871.(Primary)
Moorthy K, Munz Y, Sarker SK, et al. Objective assessment of tech- nical skills in surgery. BMJ 2003;327:1032-7.
Torsney KM, Cocker DM, Slesser AA.The modern surgeon and competency assessment: Are the workplace-based assessments evidence-based? World J Surg. 2015;39:623–633.
Beard JD. Assessment of surgical competence. Br J Surg 2007;94:1315-6
Parry-Smith W, Mahmud A, Landau A, Hayes K. Workplace-based assessment: a new approach to existing tools. The Obstetrician & Gynaecologist. 2014;16(4):281-285.(primary)
Dent J, Harden R, editors. A practical guide for medical teachers. 4th ed. China: Elsevier; 2013. p 307-13 (primary)
Martin J, Regehr G, Reznick R, Macrae H, Murnaghan J, Hutchison C et al. Objective structured assessment of technical skill (OSATS) for surgical residents. British Journal of Surgery. 1997;84(2):273-278.(primary)
Reznick R, Regehr G, MacRae H, Martin J, McCulloch W. Testing technical skill via an innovative “bench station” examination. The American Journal of Surgery. 1997;173(3):226-230.(primary)
Goff B, Lentz G, Lee D, Houmard B, Mandel L. DEVELOPMENT OF AN OBJECTIVE STRUCTURED ASSESSMENT OF TECHNICAL SKILLS FOR OBSTETRIC AND GYNECOLOGY RESIDENTS. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2000;96(1):146-150.(primary)
[Internet]. Rcog.org.uk. 2020 [cited 29 December 2020]. Available from: https://www.rcog.org.uk/globalassets/documents/careers-and-training/assessment-and-progression-through-training/osats_formative_1_august_2014.pdf(primary)
P. Harris et al.Competency-based medical education: implications for undergraduate programs
Ritchie Jr WP. The measurement of competence: current plans and future initiatives of the American Board of Surgery. Bull Am Coll Surg 2001;86:10–5
Aggarwal R, Grantcharov T, Moorthy K, Milland T, Darzi A. Toward Feasible, Valid, and Reliable Video-Based Assessments of Technical Surgical Skills in the Operating Room. Annals of Surgery. 2008;247(2):372-379.(primary).
Deyerle W. ASSOCIATION OF BONE AND JOINT SURGEONS. The Journalof Bone & Joint Surgery. 2015;38(5):1180.(primary)
Gofton WT, Dudek NL, Wood TJ, Balaa F, Hamstra SJ. The Ottawa Surgical Competency Operating Room Evaluation (O-SCORE): A tool to assess surgical competence. Acad Med. 2012;87:1401–1407.
Moorthy K, Munz Y, Sarker SK, et al. Objective assessment of technical skills in surgery. BMJ 2003;327:1032-7
Hiemstra E, Kolkman W, Wolterbeek R, Trimbos B, Jansen FW.. Value of an objective assessment tool in the operating room.Can J Surg. 2011 Apr;54(2):116-22. doi: 10.1503/cjs.032909.PMID: 21251415
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
